首页> 外文期刊>Pacific Affairs >BUNRETSU TO TOGO NO NIHON SEIJI [PARTY SYSTEM INSTITUTIONALIZATION IN JAPAN]: Tochi Kiko Kaikaku to Seito Shisutemu no Hen'yo [Between Fragmentation and Integration]
【24h】

BUNRETSU TO TOGO NO NIHON SEIJI [PARTY SYSTEM INSTITUTIONALIZATION IN JAPAN]: Tochi Kiko Kaikaku to Seito Shisutemu no Hen'yo [Between Fragmentation and Integration]

机译:Bunretsu Togo No Nihon Seiji [日本党系统制度化]:Tochi Kiko Kaikaku到Seito Shisutemu No Hen'yo [碎片和整合之间]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For a time, Japan appeared to have something like a two-party system, with the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) and Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) facing off. One of the most important puzzles facing scholars of Japanese politics is why this almost two-party system collapsed into the current fragmented party system and renewed domination of the LDP. In Party System Institutionalization in Japan, Yosuke Sunahara provides an important contribution to this puzzle, highlighting the influence of subnational politics on the national party formation. Sunahara's primary goal is to identify the institutional factors of Japan's fragmented party system. In 1994, Japan changed the electoral system for the House of Representatives from single non-transferable vote (SNTV) to a mixed-member majoritarian system (MMM), combining single member districts (SMDs) and proportional representation (PR). Previous studies explain that the inclusion of a PR tier in Japan's MMM diluted majoritarian competition. Other studies suggest that the DPJ's lack of internal policy coherence prevented it from becoming a viable opponent in the two-party system. However, Sunahara argues that the continued use of SNTV to elect local legislatures in subnational elections hinders robust party formation at the national level. In addition, Sunahara shows how, under the new decentralized fiscal structure, new institutionalized pork barrel linkages by local legislatures and chief executives of local government have also impeded the DPJ from building local party organization. This finding is also novel because, in previous studies, it is considered that decentralization could undermine the long-lasting clientelism of the LDP, which has played a central role in LDP dominance.
机译:一时间,日本似乎有一个像一个双方制度一样,日本民主党(DPJ)和自由民主党(LDP)面对。日本政治学者面临的最重要的谜题是为什么这一几乎两党系统崩溃进入当前的分散党系统并重新统治LDP。在日本的党内制度化中,Yosuke Sunahara对这场难题提供了重要贡献,突出了地方政治对国家党派形成的影响。 Sunahara的主要目标是确定日本分散党系统的制度因素。 1994年,日本将单一不可转让票(SNTV)的代表院代表改为混合成员的牧马制度(MMM),结合了单一成员区(SMD)和比例代表(公关)。以前的研究解释说,在日本的MMM摊薄竞争中纳入PR层。其他研究表明,DPJ缺乏内部政策一致性,阻碍了它在双方制度中成为一个可行的对手。然而,Sunahara认为,在国家选举中继续使用SNTV将当地立法机构妨碍国家一级的强大党派形成。此外,Sunahara表明,根据新的分散财政结构,当地立法机构和地方政府首席执行官的新制度化的猪肉杆联系也将DPJ从建立当地党组织抵抗。这一发现也是新颖的,因为在以前的研究中,它被认为可以破坏LDP的持久持久的客户,这在LDP优势中发挥了核心作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Pacific Affairs》 |2019年第2期|340-342|共3页
  • 作者

    Kenya Amano;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington Seattle USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号