首页> 外文期刊>Package printing >What's Not To Like?
【24h】

What's Not To Like?

机译:什么不喜欢?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Among the key influ-encers driving the implementation of monitor-based soft proofing and online collaboration, reduced costs and shorter time to market are twin forces to be reckoned with. Decreasing the number of hard copy proofs that are produced and shared among multiple stakeholders in different locations simultaneously yields savings in the form of shipping costs, faster customer signoffs, and potentially significant reductions in chemistry, materials, power, and other elements of the hard-copy proofing process. For these andrnother compelling reasons, the choice of a monitor-based proofing solution can be a smart decision for both vendors and clients.rnSays Larry Moore, applications support manager for EskoArtwork, "Shipping and consumables costs of $20 to $200 might not seem too expensive, but when you consider the need to deliver three or four iterations per project, the costs can add up quickly over a year's worth of projects for a given customer.
机译:在推动实施基于监视器的软打样和在线协作的关键影响因素中,降低成本和缩短上市时间是不可忽视的两股力量。减少在不同位置的多个利益相关者之间生产和共享的纸质证明的数量,可以同时节省运输成本,加快客户签收以及可能显着减少化学,材料,功率和其他硬性要素的形式复制打样过程。出于这些其他令人信服的原因,选择基于监视器的打样解决方案对于供应商和客户都是明智的决定。rnSaysLarry Moore,EskoArtwork的应用程序支持经理,“运输和消耗品的成本在20到200美元之间,似乎并不算太​​贵,但是考虑到每个项目需要交付三到四个迭代的时间,对于给定的客户,成本可能会超过一年的项目总成本。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Package printing》 |2009年第2期|12-15|共4页
  • 作者

    Jean-Marie Hershey;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号