...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence >Optimal edge detection using expansion matching and restoration
【24h】

Optimal edge detection using expansion matching and restoration

机译:使用扩展匹配和恢复的最佳边缘检测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Discusses the application of a newly developed expansion matching method for edge detection. Expansion matching optimizes a novel matching criterion called the discriminative signal-to-noise ratio (DSNR) and has been shown to robustly recognize templates under conditions of noise, severe occlusion and superposition. The DSNR criterion is better suited to evaluate matching in practical conditions than the traditional SNR since it considers as "noise" even the off-center response of the filter to the template itself. We introduce a family of optimal DSNR edge detectors based on the expansion filter for several edge models. For step edges, the optimal DSNR step expansion filter (SEF) is compared with the widely used Canny edge detector (CED). Experimental comparisons show that our edge detector yields better performance than the CED in terms of DSNR even under very adverse noise conditions. As for boundary detection, the SEF consistently yields higher figures of merit than the CED on a synthetic binary image over a wide range of noise levels. Results also show that the design parameters of size or width of the SEF are less critical than the CED variance. This means that a single scale of the SEF spans a larger range of input noise than a single scale of the CED. Experiments on a noisy image reveal that the SEF yields less noisy edge elements and preserves structural details more accurately. On the other hand, the CED output has better suppression of multiple responses than the corresponding SEF output.
机译:讨论了一种新开发的扩展匹配方法在边缘检测中的应用。扩展匹配优化了一种新的匹配标准,称为判别信噪比(DSNR),并且已证明在噪声,严重遮挡和叠加条件下能够可靠地识别模板。 DSNR标准比传统SNR更适合在实际条件下评估匹配,因为它甚至将滤波器对模板本身的偏心响应都视为“噪声”。我们针对几种边缘模型引入了基于扩展滤波器的最佳DSNR边缘检测器系列。对于台阶边缘,将最佳DSNR台阶扩展滤波器(SEF)与广泛使用的Canny边缘检测器(CED)进行比较。实验比较表明,即使在非常不利的噪声条件下,我们的边缘检测器在DSNR方面也比CED更好。至于边界检测,在广泛的噪声水平范围内,SEF在合成二进制图像上始终产生比CED高的品质因数。结果还表明,SEF大小或宽度的设计参数不如CED方差那么关键。这意味着SEF的单个标度比CED的单个标度跨越更大的输入噪声范围。在有噪图像上进行的实验表明,SEF产生的噪点较少,并且可以更准确地保留结构细节。另一方面,CED输出比相应的SEF输出具有更好的多重响应抑制能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号