Of Process and Substance in American Constitutionalism, or Williams v. Amherst: A Case of Constitutional Foundations

George Thomasa

首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on Political Science >Of Process and Substance in American Constitutionalism, or Williams v. Amherst: A Case of Constitutional Foundations

【24h】

Of Process and Substance in American Constitutionalism, or Williams v. Amherst: A Case of Constitutional Foundations

机译：美国立宪主义的过程和实质，或威廉姆斯诉阿默斯特案：立宪基金会的案例

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Perspectives on Political Science》 |2011年第2期|p.97-105|共9页
作者
George Thomasa;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. The Legal Foundations of Inequality: Constitutionalism in the Americas, 1776-1860 [J] . Colon-Rios Joel International journal of constitutional law . 2017,第2期

机译：不平等的法律基础：1776-1860年的美洲立宪主义
2. The Language of Law and the Foundations of American Constitutionalism [J] . Martin S. Flaherty Journal of American History . 2011,第2期

机译：法律语言和美国宪政的基础
3. Roberto Gargarella, The Legal Foundations of Inequality: Constitutionalism in the Americas, 1776-1860 [J] . JEREMY ADELMAN Journal of Latin American Studies . 2011,第Pta2期

机译：Roberto Gargarella，《不平等的法律基础：美洲宪政》，1776-1860年
4. APPLICATION OF NDIR ANALYZERS: ETKYLENE OXIDE PROCESS William V. Dailey [C] . William V. Dailey Annual ISA analysis instrumentation symposium . 1973

机译：NDIR分析仪的应用：环氧乙烷工艺William V. Dailey
5. The structure of a constitutional revolution: Nebbia v. New York and the collapse of laissez-faire constitutionalism [D] . Cushman, Barry James 1995

机译：宪法革命的结构：内比亚诉纽约与自由放任宪法主义的崩溃
6. Proceedings of the Annual Meetings with papers from The American Society of Plant Physiologists and The Physiological Section Botanical Society of America University of Massachusetts Amherst Massachusetts: Wednesday August 28 [O] . 1963

机译：年度会议论文集来自美国植物生理学家学会和美国植物学会生理学分会马萨诸塞州大学马萨诸塞州阿默斯特市：8月28日星期三
7. ACC/AHA/ASNC Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging—Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging)44The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.55This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees in July, 2003, the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in July, 2003, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Board of Directors in July, 2003.66When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology request that the following citation format be used: Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Bateman TM, Berman DS, Carabello BA, Cerqueira MD, DeMaria AN, Kennedy JW, Lorell BH, Messer JV, O’Gara PT, Russell RO Jr, St. John Sutton MG, Udelson JE, Verani MS, Williams KA. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1318–33.77(J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1318–33)88©2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Klocke Francis J, Baird Michael G, Lorell Beverly H, 2003

机译：ACC / AHA / ASNC心脏放射性核素成像临床使用指南-执行摘要美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（ACC / AHA / ASNC委员会，对1995年临床使用指南进行修订ACC / AHA实践指导小组）竭尽全力避免由于写作小组成员的外部关系或个人利益而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。具体来说，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组审查，在第一次会议上向书面小组的所有成员口头报告，并在发生变化时进行更新。55本文件于2003年7月获得美国心脏病学会基金会董事会的批准。 2003年7月，美国心脏协会科学咨询与协调委员会，2003年7月，美国核心脏病学会理事会。66引用该文件时，美国心脏病学会基金会，美国心脏协会和美国核学会心脏病学要求使用以下引用格式：Klocke FJ，Baird MG，Bateman TM，Berman DS，Carabello BA，Cerqueira MD，DeMaria AN，Kennedy JW，Lorell BH，Messer JV，O'Gara PT，Russell RO Jr，St John Sutton MG，Udelson JE，Verani MS，Williams KA。 ACC / AHA / ASNC心脏放射性核素成像临床使用指南-执行摘要：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践小组工作指南（ACC / AHA / ASNC委员会，修订1995年临床指南）的报告使用放射性核素成像）。 J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42：1318–33.77（J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42：1318–33）88©2003美国心脏病学会基金会和美国心脏协会版权所有。

Of Process and Substance in American Constitutionalism, or Williams v. Amherst: A Case of Constitutional Foundations

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅