• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives: studies in translatology >The (un-) ethical interpreting researcher: ethics, voice and discretionary power in interpreting research
【24h】

The (un-) ethical interpreting researcher: ethics, voice and discretionary power in interpreting research

机译：（非）伦理解释研究人员：解释研究中的伦理，话语权和酌处权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article discusses different aspects of research ethics, the researcher's voice and discretionary power in interpreting studies. Research ethics is laid down in international conventions, which in turn are reflected in national regulations and ethical vetting. Discretionary power is understood as the leeway for making conscientious decisions within the rules and regulations governing a certain field. Although research ethics in interpreting has as yet received little scholarly attention, it is important that the field discusses aspects such as informed consent and the collection, analysis and reporting of data. This article uses three case studies to discuss how researchers can handle such ethical issues. Interpreting researchers often are or have been active interpreters, and this is yet another potential challenge for the field. Such duality potentially means that the researcher needs to navigate two ethical systems, that of the interpreter and that of the researcher - systems that may come into conflict with each other. It may also entail the risk of the researcher's voice taking over the participants' narrative.
机译：本文讨论了研究伦理学的不同方面，研究人员在阐释研究中的声音和酌处权。国际公约中规定了研究伦理，这又反映在国家法规和伦理审查中。自由裁量权被理解为在管理某个领域的规则和法规内做出认真决定的余地。尽管口译研究伦理学尚未受到学术界的关注，但重要的是该领域讨论诸如知情同意以及数据的收集，分析和报告等方面。本文使用三个案例研究来讨论研究人员如何处理此类道德问题。口译研究人员通常是或曾经是活跃的口译员，这是该领域的另一个潜在挑战。这种二元性潜在地意味着研究者需要研究两个伦理体系，即解释者和研究者的伦理体系，这两个体系可能会相互冲突。这也可能带来研究人员的声音接管参与者叙述的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号