• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Psychology >Control, intentional action, and moral responsibility
【24h】

Control, intentional action, and moral responsibility

机译：控制，故意行动和道德责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Skill or control is commonly regarded as a necessary condition for intentional action. This received wisdom is challenged by experiments conducted by Joshua Knobe and Thomas Nadelhoffer, which suggest that moral considerations sometimes trump considerations of skill and control. I argue that this effect (as well as the Knobe effect) can be explained in terms of the role normative reasons play in the concept of intentional action. This explanation has significant advantages over its rivals. It involves at most a conservative extension rather than a radical revision of what we tend to believe about intentional action, and it fits better with the way we conceive of the relation between intentional action and moral responsibility.View full textDownload full textKeywordsBlameworthiness, Control, Intentional Action, Knobe Effect, Luck, Moral Responsibility, Normative Reason, SkillRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.562647
机译：技能或控制通常被认为是故意行动的必要条件。约书亚·诺贝（Joshua Knobe）和托马斯·纳德尔霍夫（Thomas Nadelhoffer）进行的实验挑战了这种公认的智慧，这些实验表明，道德方面的考虑有时胜过技能和控制方面的考虑。我认为可以用规范性理由在故意行动概念中的作用来解释这种效应（以及诺比效应）。这种解释比其竞争对手具有明显的优势。它最多只是对我们倾向于相信的故意行为进行保守的扩展，而不是进行彻底的修改，并且更适合我们对故意行为和道德责任之间关系的构想。查看全文下载全文关键字Blameworthiness，Control，Intental动作，旋钮效应，运气，道德责任，规范理性，技能相关的变量更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.562647

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号