• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophia >Overlapping Consensus or Marketplace of Religions? Rawls and Smith
【24h】

Overlapping Consensus or Marketplace of Religions? Rawls and Smith

机译：重叠的共识还是宗教市场？罗尔斯和史密斯

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this paper, I examine the claim that Rawls’s overlapping consensus is too narrow to allow most mainstream religions’ participation in political discourse. I do so by asking whether religious exclusion is a consequence of belief or action, using conversion as a paradigm case. After concluding that this objection to Rawls is, in fact, defensible, and that the overlapping consensus excludes both religious belief and action, I examine an alternative approach to managing religious pluralism as presented by Adam Smith. I show that Smith’s so-called “marketplace of religions” assumes and encourages religious conversion. I then offer objections to Smith’s approach from Rawls’s point of view, concluding that, while Rawls cannot adequately respond to the Smithian challenge, in the end the two positions are complimentary.
机译：在本文中，我研究了罗尔斯的重叠共识过于狭窄而无法让大多数主流宗教参与政治话语的说法。我通过使用转换作为范例来询问宗教排斥是否是信仰或行动的结果。在得出结论认为对罗尔斯的反对实际上是可以辩驳的，并且重叠的共识不包括宗教信仰和行动之后，我研究了亚当·斯密提出的替代方法来管理宗教多元化。我表明史密斯所谓的“宗教市场”假设并鼓励宗教信仰的转变。然后，我从罗尔斯的角度对史密斯的方法提出异议，认为罗尔斯无法充分应对史密斯主义的挑战，但最后两个职位是互补的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号