• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy >Effectiveness of mechanical debridement with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic for treating peri-implant mucositis among prediabetic cigarette-smokers and non-smokers
【24h】

Effectiveness of mechanical debridement with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic for treating peri-implant mucositis among prediabetic cigarette-smokers and non-smokers

机译：机械清创用辅助抗微生物动力学治疗前植注吸烟者和非吸烟者的腹膜粘膜炎的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of mechanical debridement (MD) with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) for treating peri-implant mucositis among prediabetic cigarette-smokers and non-smokers.Methods: Prediabetic and non-diabetic smokers and non-smokers with peri-implant mucositis were included. Patients with peri-implant mucositis were divided into 4 groups as follows: Group-1: Prediabetic smokers with peri-implant mucositis; Group-2: Prediabetic non-smokers with peri-implant mucositis; Group-3: Systemically-healthy smokers with peri-implant mucositis; and Group-4: Systemically-healthy non-smokers with peri-implant mucositis. Hemoglobin A1c levels were measured in all groups prior to MD with adjunct aPDT. Peri-implant plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP) and probing depth (PD) were assessed at baseline and at 4- and 12-weeks of follow-up. Sample-size estimation was done and data normally was assessed. Group-comparisons were performed. and P 0.01 was selected as an indicator of statistical significance.Results: Fifteen, 15, 15 and 15 individuals were included in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. At baseline, periimplant PI, BOP and PD were comparable in all groups. In prediabetic smokers and non-smokers, there was no significant difference in peri-implant PI, BOP and PD at 4- and 12-weeks' follow-up. Among non-diabetic smokers and non-smokes MD with adjunct PDT significant reduced PI (P 0.01) and PD (P 0.01) at 4- and 12-weeks' follow-up.Conclusion: The outcomes of MD with adjunct aPDT for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis are compromised in smokers and non-smokers with prediabetes. In non-diabetic smokers and non-smokers, MD with aPDT is effective for treating peri-implant mucositis.
机译：目的：目前研究的目的是将机械清除（MD）与辅助抗微生物动力学治疗（APDT）的有效性进行比较，用于治疗前素食吸烟者和非吸烟者中的Peri-incomant Mucositis。方法：预测和非 - 包括乙酰胞胎吸烟者和非吸烟者，包括Peri-incompant mucositis。患有Peri-incompant Mucositis的患者分为4组，如下：1组 - 具有Peri-incormant Mucositis的排放吸烟者;第2组：具有Peri-incormant Mucositis的预先耐药非吸烟者;第3组：系统性健康的吸烟者，具有Peri-incomant Mucositis;和第4组：系统健康的非吸烟者，具有PERI-植入物粘膜炎。血红蛋白A1C水平在MD的所有基团中测量，所述MD与辅助APDT。在基线中评估探测（BOP）和探测深度（PD）的PERI植入斑块指数（PI），并在基线和4-周内进行后续行动。样本尺寸估计已完成，数据通常进行评估。进行组 - 进行比较。选择P <0.01作为统计学意义的指标。结果：十五，15,15和15个个体分别包含在1,2,3和4组中。在基线，PeriiMplant PI，BOP和PD在所有组中相当。在排放的吸烟者和非吸烟者中，在4-和12周的后续行动中，PER-incomant PI，BOP和PD没有显着差异。在非糖尿病吸烟者和非吸烟MD中，辅助PDT显着降低的PI（P <0.01）和PD（P <0.01），在4-周末后续行动。结论：具有辅助APDT的MD的结果Peri-incompant Mucositis的治疗在吸烟者和非吸烟者中受到患者。在非糖尿病吸烟者和非吸烟者中，具有APDT的MD对于治疗PERI-植入物粘膜炎是有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号