After 25 years of covering the oil and gas industry, I can still find time for a good laugh; either that or shake my head in frustration, yank out some gray hairs and ask, "why"? The other day I was perusing emails when this grabbed my attention. "Poll: Key Primary Voters Support Arctic Drilling, Say Energy is Important Issue in 2016 Race." There's this energy advocacy group called Consumer Energy Alliance that's connected to a Washington, DC lobbyist group, HBW Resources. David Holt is managing partner of HBW Resources and happens to be president of the CEA. They hired pollsters to survey voters of the first three primary states, Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, about their views on energy policy. Well, sort of. The surveys ask a dozen questions, mostly focusing on voting preferences for 2016. Hint: they all think Hillary Clinton is a shoo-in on the Democratic side.
展开▼
机译：在从事石油和天然气行业25年之后，我仍然可以抽出时间欢笑。要么沮丧地摇着头，拉出几根白发，然后问：“为什么”？前几天，当我引起注意时，我正在仔细阅读电子邮件。 “民意调查：主要的主要选民支持北极钻井，并说能源是2016年比赛的重要议题。”有一个名为“消费者能源联盟”的能源倡导组织，与华盛顿特区的游说组织HBW Resources建立了联系。 David Holt是HBW Resources的执行合伙人，恰好是CEA的总裁。他们聘请民意调查者对爱荷华州，新罕布什尔州和南卡罗来纳州这三个主要州的选民进行了调查，以了解他们对能源政策的看法。好吧，有点。调查提出了十二个问题，主要集中在2016年的投票偏好上。提示：他们都认为希拉里·克林顿是民主党方面的惯用语。
展开▼
