...
【24h】

EDITOR'S NOTEBOOK

机译:编者注

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I have some final thoughts about the Keystone XL debacle, because that's what it was. That project never should have been the line in the sand in the debate over climate change, because as we all know, any environmental effect would have been negligible at worst. Who are the winners? The environmentalists and their fossil-fuel hating friends; President Obama, who deluded many of us into actually believing he would give Keystone a fair shake; OPEC and other foreign sources of crude, because they have again helped cripple our industry; maybe the oil sands region itself since this form of extraction is not the best method of recovering oil; and my late colleague Carol Freedenthal, who bet me years ago that Obama would never approve Keystone.
机译:对于Keystone XL的崩溃,我有最后的想法,因为那是事实。在有关气候变化的辩论中,该项目永远不应该成为障碍,因为众所周知,任何环境影响在最坏的情况下都可以忽略不计。谁是赢家?环保主义者及其讨厌化石燃料的朋友;奥巴马总统欺骗了我们许多人,他们实际上认为他会给基斯通一个公平的震动;欧佩克和其他外国原油来源,因为它们再次帮助削弱了我们的行业;也许是油砂地区本身,因为这种提取方式并不是回收石油的最佳方法;还有我已故的同事卡罗尔·弗兰登塔尔(Carol Freedenthal),几年前曾打赌我说奥巴马永远不会批准Keystone。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Pipeline & gas journal》 |2015年第12期|2-2|共1页
  • 作者

    Jeff Share;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号