...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Plane & pilot >Were These Two Pilots Really Incapacitated?
【24h】

Were These Two Pilots Really Incapacitated?

机译：这两个飞行员真的没有能力吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The reports prepared by the NTSB on light sport and experimental category accidents usually don't consume a significant amount of the agency's resources. The airplanes are too light and carry too little fuel to cause mass destruction and, when there are fatalities, the number of deceased almost invariably is limited to one or two. It's my observation that the Safety Board tends not to use too much manpower, paper or bytes on its computers when dealing with these accidents. Perhaps not too coincidentally, they tend to attract comparatively little attention both in the aviation community and news media. Recently, however, the reports on two of these accidents attracted a good deal of attention when their probable causes caused AOPA to do a double-take. Controversy flourished just as the aviation community was getting ready to move into the era of BasicMed, in which tens of thousands of pilots will no longer be handcuffed to the third-class medical certificate.
机译：NTSB编写的有关轻型运动和实验类事故的报告通常不会消耗该机构的大量资源。飞机太轻，携带的燃料太少，不会造成大规模毁灭，当有死亡事故时，死者的人数几乎总是被限制在一到两个。据我观察，安全委员会在处理这些事故时往往不会在计算机上使用过多的人力，纸张或字节。也许不是太巧合，但它们在航空界和新闻媒体中往往吸引的关注相对较少。但是，最近，关于其中两起事故的报告，当其可能的原因导致AOPA采取了双重措施时，引起了很多关注。就在航空界正准备进入BasicMed时代之际，争议日益盛行，在该时代，成千上万的飞行员将不再被扣上三等医疗证书。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Plane & pilot》 |2017年第9期|56-58|共3页
  • 作者

    Peter Katz;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号