...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Planning Perspectives >'The field of grain is gone; It's now a Tesco Superstore': representations of 'urban' and 'rural' within historical and contemporary discourses opposing urban expansion in England
【24h】

'The field of grain is gone; It's now a Tesco Superstore': representations of 'urban' and 'rural' within historical and contemporary discourses opposing urban expansion in England

机译：“粮食领域不见了；它现在是一家乐购超市”：在历史和当代话语中，“城市”和“农村”的表现与英格兰城市扩张相对立

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Ideas about the difference between rural and urban areas are woven into the fabric of English society. This paper asks how two different campaigns against urban expansion and rural homebuilding in England - one interwar and one more contemporary (related to the production of the National Planning Policy Framework' document) - represent the difference between rural' and urban' and how they use these representations to justify and naturalize their arguments. Utilizing interpretive textual analysis to compare the two periods, we show that, whilst planning has undergone significant paradigm shifts during the period between the two campaigns, in both archives a dominant rural idyll' is (re)produced and reinforced through the representational themes of beauty, nature, purity, an elite educated class, and a traditional social order. This is strongly contrasted to the representation of the urban sphere' as an unnatural, ugly, modern, and socially fragmented dystopia. Urban' areas are therefore constructed as the constitutive Other' to the rural idyll. In this way, the apparently natural urban characteristics associated with built-up areas are represented as out of place' within the rural sphere. These representations work to justify the argument that development' is a threat to the intrinsic characteristics of the countryside and should not be allowed to take place. This rural idyll/urban dystopia binary is argued to continue to have an important influence on shaping policy debate.
机译：关于城乡差异的想法被编织成英国社会的结构。本文提出了两种反对英格兰城市扩张和农村房屋建设的运动，一次是两次大战之间，另一次是当代（与《国家规划政策框架》文件的产生有关）如何代表着农村和城市之间的差异以及它们如何使用这些表述可以证明其论点合理化和自然化。利用解释性文本分析来比较这两个时期，我们表明，尽管在两次竞选之间的时期内，规划经历了重大的范式转变，但在两个档案中，主要的田园诗还是通过代表性的美丽主题而被再现和强化的。 ，自然，纯洁，受过良好教育的阶级和传统的社会秩序。这与将城市范围表示为不自然，丑陋，现代且社会支离破碎的反乌托邦形成鲜明对比。因此，城市“地区”被构建为农村田园诗的“其他”组成部分。这样，与建成区相关的表面上自然的城市特征就被表示为在农村范围内的“错位”。这些表述可以证明“发展”是对农村固有特征的威胁，因此不应该发生。据认为，这种农村田园诗/城市反乌托邦二元对塑造政策辩论继续具有重要影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号