Court decision on Mobile-Sierra doctrine limits its protections for contracting parties

Alan Kovski

首页> 外文期刊>Electric Utility Week >Court decision on Mobile-Sierra doctrine limits its protections for contracting parties

【24h】

Court decision on Mobile-Sierra doctrine limits its protections for contracting parties

机译：法院关于“移动塞拉利昂主义”的裁决限制了对缔约方的保护

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

A federal appeals court decision limiting the application of the "public interest" standard in protecting contracts has much broader implications than the ISO New England case that triggered it. That standard of contract review cannot limit the rights of third parties to bring legal action under the less- stringent "just and resonable" standard, the cout said.

机译：联邦上诉法院关于限制“公共利益”标准在保护合同中的适用范围的判决，比触发该判决的ISO新英格兰案具有更广泛的含义。合同审查的标准不能限制第三方根据较宽松的“公正和合理”标准提起法律诉讼的权利。

著录项

来源
《Electric Utility Week》 |2008年第07期|p.27-28|共2页
作者
Alan Kovski;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类电工技术;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Supreme Court Majority Rules Mobile-Sierra Doctrine Applies to Rate Challenges by Non-Contracting Parties [J] . Foster Natural Gas Report Group Foster Natural Gas Report . 2010,第2779期

机译：最高法院多数人裁定流动塞拉利昂主义适用于对非合同方提出的质疑进行评级
2. English Courts Address the Potential Convergence between the Doctrines of Piercing the Corporate Veil, Party Autonomy in Jurisdiction Agreements and Privity of Contract [J] . Chukwuma Samuel Adesina Okoli The journal of business law . 2014,第3期

机译：英国法院探讨了揭穿公司面纱，管辖权协议中的当事方自治和合同优先权之间的潜在趋同
3. Exercise of representation in the field of facilities required for employees established “ex lege” and limits of the company’s disciplinary faculties in this context. Comment of the decision of the Spanish Supreme Court, given in unificatio of doctrine [J] . Rafael Senra Biedma IusLabor . 2015,第1期

机译：在这种情况下，在员工所需的设施领域中行使代表权已建立了“合法”范围，并限制了公司的学科能力。统一理论对西班牙最高法院裁决的评论
4. Macondo Litigation Update-How Court Decisions Will Impact Oilfield Contracting and Insurance Practices [C] . Cary A. Moomjian Jr. Drilling Conference and Exhibition . 2014

机译：Macondo诉讼更新 - 法院决策如何影响油田承包和保险实践
5. The right to obtain patent protection on living material: The causes and consequences of the United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Diamond v. Chakrabarty. [D] . Howe, Kevin F. 2007

机译：获得生物材料专利保护的权利：美国最高法院在Diamond诉Chakrabarty案中的判决的成因和后果。
6. High Court upholds NICE decision to limit treatments for Alzheimers disease [O] . Owen Dyer 2007

机译：高等法院维持NICE决定限制阿尔茨海默氏病治疗的决定
7. Third Party Legal Protection in the Cooperation Agreement for Purchasing Company Assets (Analysis of the Decision of the Mataram High Court Number: 10 / PDT / 2018 / PT. MTR) [O] . Michael Anshori, Zainal Asikin, Djumardin Djumardin 2019

机译：第三方采购公司资产合作协议中的法律保护（Mataram高等法院的决定分析：10 / PDT / 2018 / PT。地铁）

Court decision on Mobile-Sierra doctrine limits its protections for contracting parties

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅