...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Electric Utility Week >9th Circuit Remands Western Contracts Case To Ferc For Possible Issue Reconsideration
【24h】

9th Circuit Remands Western Contracts Case To Ferc For Possible Issue Reconsideration

机译：第九巡回法院将西方合同案还给可能的问题重审

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A federal appeals court last week paved the way for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to reconsider its refusal to alter or do away with hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of long-term power contracts during the 2000-2001 Western energy crisis. Following up on a recent Supreme Court decision, the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit vacated its previous opinion and remanded the case to FERC "for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's rulings." The Supreme Court in June ruled that FERC should "amplify or clarify" its decision to leave the contracts intact. The court wants FERC to weigh in on whether the contracts cause an excessive burden on consumers or otherwise seriously harm the public interest, and whether the commission can find a connection between unlawful activity of participants in the spot market and the contract rate. The Mobile-Sierra doctrine, the Supreme Court said, presumes a rate set out in a freely negotiated wholesale energy contract meets just-and-reasonable standards outlined in the Federal Power Act unless FERC finds that the contract seriously harms the public interest.
机译：上周，一个联邦上诉法院为联邦能源管理委员会重新考虑其拒绝改变或取消2000-2001年西方能源危机期间价值数亿美元的长期电力合同铺平了道路。继最高法院最近的一项决定之后，美国第九巡回上诉法院撤回了先前的意见，并将该案发还给FERC，“以寻求与最高法院的裁定相一致的进一步程序。”最高法院在6月裁定，FERC应该“扩大或澄清”其保留完整合同的决定。法院希望FERC权衡这些合同是否给消费者带来了沉重负担或以其他方式严重损害了公共利益，以及委员会是否可以在现货市场参与者的非法活动与合同费率之间找到联系。最高法院说，流动塞拉利昂主义认为，自由协商的批发能源合同中规定的费率符合《联邦电力法》​​中概述的合理标准，除非FERC认为该合同严重损害了公共利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号