...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policing >The gap between reality and research Another look at detecting deception in field settings
【24h】

The gap between reality and research Another look at detecting deception in field settings

机译：现实与研究之间的差距另一角度看待现场设置中的欺骗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a review of the deception detection literature that arrives at a different conclusion from the one presented by King and Dunn. Specifically, the authors' review shows that people can detect deception at significantly above chance accuracy in policing environments. A new paradigm for deception detection is also discussed. Design/methodology/approach - An extensive literature review was conducted. Findings - People can detect deception at levels that exceed chance in a variety of police-related environments when an ecological approach to detecting deception is adopted. Practical implications - The authors' review suggests that it is time for deception detection training and manuals to move away from the demeanor-based systems that are currently dominant and toward coherence and correspondence-based systems. Originality/value - The paper presents a perspective that is different from the one advanced by King and Dunn. It also introduces the ecological detection of deception paradigm to the policing literature.
机译：目的-本文的目的是对欺骗检测文献进行综述，得出与King和Dunn提出的结论不同的结论。具体来说，作者的评论表明，在警务环境中，人们可以以大大高于偶然性的准确率检测到欺骗。还讨论了欺骗检测的新范例。设计/方法/方法-进行了广泛的文献综述。调查结果-采用生态学方法检测欺骗时，人们可以在各种与警察相关的环境中以超过偶然的机会检测到欺骗。实际意义-作者的评论表明，现在应该进行欺骗检测培训和手册，从目前占主导地位的基于行为举止的系统转向基于连贯性和对应关系的系统。原创性/价值-本文提出的观点不同于King和Dunn提出的观点。它还将警惕性范式的生态检测引入到警务文献中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号