...
首页> 外文期刊>Policing >Decision-making styles, stress and gender among investigators
【24h】

Decision-making styles, stress and gender among investigators

机译:研究者的决策风格,压力和性别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between police investigators' decision-making styles, degree of judgmental self-doubt and work conditions, on the one hand, and their wellbeing, stress, burnout tendency and sleep quality, on the other. Design/methodology/approach - The study concerns investigative police officers (n = 203). Decision-making styles were measured by Scott and Brace's General Decision Making Style scale (GDMS), and judgmental self-doubt by Mirels et al's Judgmental Self-Doubt Scale (JSDS). Wellbeing was measured by the Satisfaction With Life scale (SWL), and stress and burnout tendency by the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) and a scale for Performance Based Self-Esteem (PBS). Questions on sleep quality and work conditions were also used. Findings - High values on the decision-making styles Avoidant (tries to avoid making decisions) and Dependent (dependent on advice from others before important decisions) were associated with higher PBS, higher PSQ and poorer sleep quality. In addition, the Avoidant style was associated with lower SWL. Both the Dependent and the Avoidant styles were associated with higher influence experienced by others in the investigative work. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that JSDS explained the outcome measures better than the Dependent and the Avoidant decision-making styles. Gender analyses showed that male investigators showed higher values on Rational decision-making style ("exhaustive information search" and "logical evaluation of alternatives") and female investigators higher values on the Dependent decision-making style. Female investigators also evidenced a higher degree of stress and performance-based self-esteem. Research limitations/implications - The data were collected in a Swedish context and may not be fully generalizable to other countries. Practical implications - These results suggest the need to individualize training programs that seek to ameliorate stress and burnout. Originality/value - This paper furthers understanding of the relation between decision-making styles and wellbeing and stress in police investigators.
机译:目的-这项研究的目的是一方面分析警察调查员的决策风格,判断性自我怀疑程度和工作条件之间的关系,以及他们的幸福感,压力,倦怠倾向和睡眠质量,其他。设计/方法/方法-该研究涉及调查警察(n = 203)。决策风格通过Scott和Brace的通用决策风格量表(GDMS)进行衡量,而判断自我怀疑则通过Mirels等人的判断性自我怀疑量表(JSDS)进行衡量。用生活满意度量表(SWL)衡量幸福感,用知觉压力问卷(PSQ)和基于表现的自尊心量表(PBS)衡量压力和倦怠趋势。还使用了有关睡眠质量和工作条件的问题。发现-决策风格的高价值回避者(避免做出决策的尝试)和依赖项(依赖重要决策之前其他人的建议)与较高的PBS,较高的PSQ和较差的睡眠质量有关。此外,回避风格与较低的SWL有关。无论是从属风格还是回避风格,都与他人在调查工作中的较高影响力有关。层次回归分析表明,JSDS优于“从属”和“回避”决策风格,可以更好地解释结果度量。性别分析表明,男性调查人员在理性决策风格(“穷举信息搜索”和“替代方案的逻辑评估”)上表现出更高的价值,而女性调查员在从属决策风格上表现出更高的价值。女调查人员还证明了较高的压力和基于表现的自尊。研究的局限性/意义-数据是在瑞典的背景下收集的,可能无法完全推广到其他国家。实际意义-这些结果表明,需要个性化的训练计划以减轻压力和倦怠。原创性/价值-本文进一步了解了警察调查员的决策风格与幸福感和压力之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号