• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policing >Police department and instructor perspectives on pre-service firearm and deadly force training
【24h】

Police department and instructor perspectives on pre-service firearm and deadly force training

机译：警察部门和教练对职前枪支和致命部队训练的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine perceptions of police departments and instructors regarding academy-based pre-service firearm and deadly force training. Design/methodology/approach - Surveys of department-based instructors (n = 175) and state and local police departments (n = 116) in Washington State provided ratings and other data on pre-service academy training and included department-based training provided before and/or after attending the academy. Findings - The paper found academy graduates' skills generally were rated as adequate. Ratings for tactics and decision making were lower, and many departments noted that these areas needed more attention. Some departments also provided extensive post-academy training before allowing their new officers to work armed. Nevertheless, many departments used BLEA's handgun qualification course-of-fire for in-service requalification and, in some cases, training. Research limitations - The research setting was one state and the study focused on firearm and deadly force training. Practical limitations/implications - The paper shows pre-service firearm and deadly force training is crucial for officer and public safety at the outset of officers' employment. It also lays the foundation for department in-service training. Because departments exercise considerable latitude over the content, techniques and instructional methods of their own programs, the nature and extent of academy training has implications for officers' skills and abilities in the long term, too. Originality/value - This paper shows prior research has concentrated on the perceptions of academy graduates and the full spectrum job tasks associated with policing and/or -taking their certification examinations. It provides detailed insights into a specific training job-task area, as well as from important stakeholders such as departments and their instructors, not previously available.
机译：目的-本文的目的是研究警察部门和教官对基于学院的职前枪支和致命部队训练的看法。设计/方法/方法-对华盛顿州基于部门的讲师（n = 175）以及州和地方警察部门（n = 116）进行的调查提供了职前学院培训的等级和其他数据，其中包括之前提供的基于部门的培训和/或参加该学院后。调查结果-该论文发现，大学毕业生的技能通常被评为足够。战术和决策制定的等级较低，许多部门指出，这些领域需要更多关注。一些部门在允许新人员武装之前，还提供了广泛的学后培训。尽管如此，许多部门还是使用BLEA的手枪资格认证课程进行服务中的重新认证，并在某些情况下进行了培训。研究局限性-研究环境是一种状态，研究重点是火器和致命力训练。实际的局限性/含义-该文件显示，在开始雇用军官时，岗前枪支和致命部队培训对于军官和公共安全至关重要。这也为部门在职培训奠定了基础。由于各部门在各自课程的内容，技术和教学方法上有很大的自由度，因此，长期而言，学院培训的性质和程度也会对官员的技能和能力产生影响。原创性/价值-本文表明先前的研究集中在对大学毕业生的看法以及与维持治安和/或参加其认证考试相关的全职工作中。它提供了对特定培训工作任务领域以及重要的利益相关者（如部门及其讲师）以前没有的详细见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号