...
首页> 外文期刊>Policing >A comparative study of the police code of silence Exploring the relation between the code of silence and societal characteristics
【24h】

A comparative study of the police code of silence Exploring the relation between the code of silence and societal characteristics

机译:警察沉默守则探讨沉默守则与社会特征关系的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the contours of the police code of silence, a critical component of the ability to control misconduct and enhance integrity within any police agency. Unlike the extant research, dominated by single-country studies, this paper provides an in-depth exploration of the code across five countries and tests the relation between the code of science and societal characteristics. Design/methodology/approach A police integrity survey was used to measure the contours of the code of silence among police officers in Australia (n=856), Croatia (n=966), South Africa (n=871), South Korea (n=379) and the USA (n=664). The respondents evaluated 11 hypothetical scenarios describing various forms of police misconduct. Findings Bivariate analyses reveal considerable divergence in the code of silence across the five countries. Multivariate models of the code of silence show that, next to organizational factors (i.e. the respondents' assessment of peers' willingness to report, evaluations of misconduct seriousness and expected discipline) and individual factors (i.e. supervisory status), societal factors (i.e. the Corruption Perceptions Index score and the percent of irreligious citizens) are significant predictors of the respondents' willingness to report.Originality/value Whereas the study of the code of silence has started several decades ago, no prior study has tested the effects of organizational and societal variables on the code of silence in a comparative perspective.
机译:目的本文的目的是探讨警察沉默守则的轮廓,这是控制不当行为和加强任何警察机构内的诚信能力的关键组成部分。与以独立研究为主的独立研究,本文对五个国家的守则进行了深入深入的探索,并测试了科学守则与社会特征之间的关系。设计/方法/方法警察诚信调查用于衡量澳大利亚警察(n = 856),克罗地亚(n = 966),南非(n = 871),韩国(n = 871)的沉默守则的轮廓(n = 379)和美国(n = 664)。受访者评估了11个假设情景,描述了各种形式的警察不当行为。研究结果分析揭示了五个国家的沉默准则中的相当偏差。沉默守则的多变量模型表明,在组织因素旁边(即受访者对同行报告的意愿,对不当行为严重和预期纪律的评估)和个人因素(即监督地位),社会因素(即腐败感知指数分数和百分比的百分比是答辩公民的重要预测因素的受访者的报告意愿。更多的人,而沉默守则的研究已经开始了几十年前,并且没有先前的研究测试了组织和社会变量的影响论比较视角下的沉默准则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号