• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >Thick populism: democracy-enhancing popular participation
【24h】

Thick populism: democracy-enhancing popular participation

机译：浓厚的民粹主义：增强民主的民众参与

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article posits that some forms of popular participation offer important resources for democratic renewal. It develops a conceptual distinction between thin and thick varieties of populism. Thin populist movements mobilize popular support to replace elite leaders by undermining or corroding the deliberative and inclusionary principles of representative government. In contrast, thick populist movements seek to modify or alter the practices and conventions of representative government by offering democracy-enhancing and trust-building organizational forms and political practices. This distinction between thin and thick populism helps identify a swath of normative and practical common-ground occupied by populists and deliberative democratic reformers and innovators, who have also held deeply critical views of representative democracy. The article discusses four contemporary examples of democratic innovation (broadly understood) to illustrate how thick populism can take root in organizations, institutions, campaigns, and in the efforts of everyday citizens. Consideration is given to the lessons that contemporary forms of thick populism offer for advocates of participatory and deliberative democratic innovation.
机译：本文认为，某些形式的民众参与为民主复兴提供了重要资源。它在薄弱的民粹主义种类之间形成了概念上的区别。薄弱的民粹主义运动通过破坏或腐蚀代议制政府的审议和包容性原则，动员民众支持以取代精英领导人。相反，浓厚的民粹主义运动试图通过提供增强民主和建立信任的组织形式和政治实践来改变或改变代议制政府的惯例和惯例。薄弱民粹主义与厚重民粹主义之间的区别有助于确定民粹主义者，审议民主改革者和创新者所占据的一整套规范性和实践性共同点，他们也对代议制民主持深刻的批判观点。本文讨论了四个民主创新的当代例子（被广泛理解），以说明浓厚的民粹主义如何在组织，机构，运动和日常公民的努力中扎根。考虑到当代形式的浓厚民粹主义为参与性和协商性民主创新的倡导者提供的经验教训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号