• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >Losing localism, constraining councillors: why the Northern Territory supershires are struggling
【24h】

Losing localism, constraining councillors: why the Northern Territory supershires are struggling

机译：失去地方主义，限制议员：北领地超级郡为何苦苦挣扎

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Local government reform in Australia's sparsely settled Northern Territory resulted in the emergence of large, remote area, regional shires in 2008. This paper outlines the history of remote area local government in the Northern Territory since 'self-government' in 1978 and compares these new large supershires with the more dispersed system of local government which preceded them. It argues that the large remote area shires are struggling to be accepted by their predominantly Aboriginal constituencies due to two significant changes in ideas. The first is a loss of the ideas of localism and self-determination, which sustained the previous generation of smaller, dispersed local governments. The second is the rise of the idea that the roles of elected councillors in local government should be constrained and those of appointed staff enhanced. The paper questions the wisdom of both these changes in the particular context of remote area, predominantly Indigenous, local government.
机译：澳大利亚在人烟稀少的北领地进行的地方政府改革导致2008年出现了大片偏远地区的郡郡。本文概述了自1978年“自治”以来北领地偏远地区地方政府的历史，并对其进行了比较。大型超级郡，其地方政府体制较为分散。它认为，由于思想上的两个重大变化，大片偏远地区的郡正努力被其主要的原住民选区所接受。首先是丧失了地方主义和自决权的思想，这种思想使上一代规模较小，分散的地方政府得以维持。第二个想法是，应该限制民选议员在地方政府中的作用，而任命工作人员的作用应得到加强。本文质疑在偏远地区（主要是土著地方政府）的特定情况下这两种变化的智慧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号