• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >Whatever happened to Regulation theory? The Regulation approach and local government revisited
【24h】

Whatever happened to Regulation theory? The Regulation approach and local government revisited

机译：监管理论发生了什么？监管方式和地方政府的重新审视

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article contributes to an ongoing debate about the causal source of policy change by considering whether the Régulation approach, which has been largely discarded since the 1990s, can help to explain change in economic development polices at the level of local government in the UK. First, the 'decline' of the approach is explained by interviewing key exponents of the approach from the 1990s. Second, the approach is applied to a narrative of local economic policy in the City of York 1980 2006. In applying the Régulation approach, a number of problems are encountered. Chiefly, as a macro-approach, it lacks the finer tools to be able to explain all aspects of local change. Moreover, the approach is open to the charge of over-determinism by over-privileging the role of economic crisis in change. In the case of York, the cause of change has not been any crisis of Fordism but instead an acceptance of neo-liberalism in national and international spheres of governance, the inevitability of which may be overstated by exponents of the crisis of Fordism. However, the application of the Régulation approach to the case study reaffirms the importance of broader hegemonic political struggles and economic change to the study of local institutions, and the insights that more holistic analysis can make to the study of institutional change. Without some linkage to the broader economic and political hegemonic struggles, that the Régulation approach provides, meso-level theories are inherently wanting. The approach may be worth revisiting in the light of the new crisis of capitalism.
机译：本文通过考虑是否从1990年代开始就大范围抛弃的重新监管方法，可以帮助解释英国地方政府层面上经济发展政策的变化，从而为有关政策变更因果关系的持续辩论做出了贡献。首先，通过采访1990年代以来该方法的关键指数来解释该方法的“下降”。其次，该方法被应用于1980年约克市2006年的地方经济政策叙述。在应用Régulation方法时，会遇到许多问题。首先，作为一种宏观方法，它缺乏更好的工具来解释本地变化的各个方面。此外，该方法还可以通过过度赋予经济危机在变革中的作用来承担过度确定性的责任。就约克而言，变革的原因不是福特主义的危机，而是在国家和国际治理领域接受新自由主义，福特主义危机的指数可能夸大了其新的必然性。但是，将Régulation方法应用到案例研究中，重申了更广泛的霸权政治斗争和经济变革对地方机构研究的重要性，以及更全面的分析可以对制度变革进行研究的见解。如果不使用Régulation方法所提供的与更广泛的经济和政治霸权斗争之间的联系，那么中层理论就必然是需要的。鉴于新的资本主义危机，这种方法可能值得重新审视。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号