• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >The reform of the 2003 Common Agricultural Policy: an advocacy coalition explanation
【24h】

The reform of the 2003 Common Agricultural Policy: an advocacy coalition explanation

机译：2003年共同农业政策的改革：倡导联盟的解释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article addresses the core research question - how can we understand the policy processes leading to the 2003 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform? It utilizes the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) perspective as an explanatory framework for these purposes in a European Union (EU) policy area which normally lies outside ACF applications. In the ACF, it is assumed that advocacy coalitions will resist information that challenges the policy core beliefs of decision actors. This characteristic is even stronger in semi-federalist systems such as the EU. Hence, a high degree of consensus is required to change the policy core, as was the case with the 2003 CAP reform. The article shows that the ACF can be expanded to explain the CAP reform. It also demonstrates that the preconditions identified by the ACF for a successful consensus process were fulfilled in the reform process. The onset of the BSE crisis and the emergent international trade negotiations meant that the status quo was no longer unacceptable. Most of the negotiations leading up to the CAP reform were held in private and took a great deal of time. Commissioner Fischler was willing to act as facilitator in the process and strove to make the reform process as non-normative as possible. However, in order to accommodate the criticism of the ACF for not taking collective action problems serious, it is also observed that new forms of non-trivial coordination occurred, namely discursive coordination, which became the most frequently used form of coordination during the 2003 CAP reform process and which is much less problematic as far as collective action problems are concerned.
机译：本文解决了核心研究问题-我们如何理解导致2003年共同农业政策（CAP）改革的政策过程？在欧洲联盟（EU）政策领域（通常不在ACF应用程序范围之内），它利用倡导联盟框架（ACF）的观点作为这些目的的解释性框架。在ACF中，假设倡导联盟将抵制挑战决策者政策核心信念的信息。在像欧盟这样的半联邦制国家中，这一特征更加明显。因此，与2003年CAP的改革一样，需要高度共识来改变政策核心。该文章表明，可以扩展ACF来解释CAP改革。它还表明，在改革过程中，ACF确定了成功达成共识过程的前提条件。疯牛病危机的爆发和即将到来的国际贸易谈判意味着现状不再是不能接受的。导致CAP改革的大多数谈判都是私下进行的，花费了大量时间。菲施勒专员愿意在此过程中担任促进者，并力争使改革过程尽可能不规范。但是，为了适应对ACF没有认真对待集体行动问题的批评，还注意到，出现了新的非平凡协调形式，即话语协调，这已成为2003年CAP中最常用的协调形式改革过程，就集体行动问题而言，这没有多大问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号