• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >The scientific and technological interdisciplinary research of government research institutes: network analysis of the innovation cluster in South Korea
【24h】

The scientific and technological interdisciplinary research of government research institutes: network analysis of the innovation cluster in South Korea

机译：政府研究机构的科技跨学科研究：韩国创新集群的网络分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Interdisciplinary research (IDR) has been a growing paradigm in science and technology for the past few decades because of the increase in the complexity of scientific and technological innovation. However, only a small amount of research has examined how IDR across different disciplines has developed over the past few decades and its relationship with R&D performance. This study examines the development of IDR in various scientific disciplines from the perspective of science and technology and its relationship to R&D performance. In doing so, we analyze the co-authorship of all the papers and patents produced by government research institutes in the largest innovation cluster in South Korea, that is, Daedeok Innopolis, during 1992 and 2012 using a network analysis. Those institutes each focus on a different specific discipline. We found that not only does the IDR network structure demonstrate that IDR increased over time regardless of the discipline but also that the scope of IDR has expanded across all the research institutes. In addition, the development of IDR in different disciplines varies significantly, depending on the scientific disciplines. Interestingly, we also found that higher interdisciplinarity in scientific publications and patents is significantly correlated with higher R&D performance.
机译：过去几十年来，跨学科研究（IDR）在过去的几十年里一直是在科学和技术方面的越来越多的范式，因为科技创新的复杂性的增加。然而，只有少量的研究已经审查了在过去的几十年中开发了不同学科的IDR以及与研发性能的关系。本研究探讨了科学技术视角的各种科学学科的IDR的发展及其与研发性能的关系。在这样做时，我们分析了政府研究机构在韩国最大的创新集群中产生的所有论文和专利的共同作者，即Daedeok Innopolis，在1992年和2012年期间使用网络分析。那些研究所的每个机构都专注于不同的特定学科。我们发现IDR网络结构不仅证明IDR随着时间的推移而增加，而且IDR的范围已经扩展到所有研究机构。此外，根据科学学科，不同学科的IDR的发展有很大差异。有趣的是，我们还发现科学出版物和专利中更高的跨学科性与较高的研发性能显着相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号