...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Political Analysis >Measurement Equivalence of Nationalism and Constructive Patriotism in the ISSP: 34 Countries in a Comparative Perspective
【24h】

Measurement Equivalence of Nationalism and Constructive Patriotism in the ISSP: 34 Countries in a Comparative Perspective

机译：ISSP中民族主义与建设性爱国主义的衡量等值：比较视角下的34个国家

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Studies on national identity differentiate between nationalistic attitudes and constructive patriotism (CP) as two more specific expressions of national identity and as theoretically two distinct concepts. After a brief discussion of the theoretical literature, the following questions are examined: (1) Can nationalism and CP be empirically identified as two distinct concepts?; (2) Is their meaning fully or partially invariant across countries?; and (3) Is it possible to compare their means across countries? Data from the International Social Survey Program (ISSP) 2003 National Identity Module are utilized to answer these questions in a sample of 34 countries. Items to measure nationalism and CP are chosen based on the literature, and a series of confirmatory factor analyses to test for configural, measurement (metric), and scalar invariance are performed. Full or partial metric invariance is a necessary condition for equivalence of meaning across cultures and for a meaningful comparison of associations with other theoretical constructs. Scalar invariance is a necessary condition for comparison of means across countries. Findings reveal that nationalism and CP emerge as two distinct constructs. However, in some countries, some items that were intended to measure one construct also measure the other construct. Furthermore, configural and metric invariance are found across the full set of 34 countries. Consequently, researchers may now use the ISSP data to study relationships among nationalism, CP, and other theoretical constructs across these nations. However, the analysis did not support scalar invariance, making it problematic for comparing the means of nationalism and CP across countries.
机译：关于民族认同的研究区分了民族主义态度和建设性爱国主义（CP），这是民族认同的两个更具体的表达，并且在理论上是两个不同的概念。在对理论文献进行了简短讨论之后，对以下问题进行了研究：（1）是否可以凭经验将民族主义和共产党确定为两个截然不同的概念？ （2）它们的含义在各个国家中是完全不变还是部分不变？ （3）是否有可能在不同国家比较他们的收入？来自国际社会调查计划（ISSP）2003国家身份模块的数据在34个国家的样本中用于回答这些问题。根据文献选择用于衡量民族主义和CP的项目，并进行一系列验证性因素分析以测试结构性，度量（度量）和标量不变性。完全或部分度量不变性是在各种文化中实现含义相等以及与其他理论构造进行有意义的比较的必要条件。标量不变性是比较各国平均值的必要条件。调查结果表明，民族主义和共产党是两个截然不同的结构。但是，在某些国家/地区中，某些旨在衡量一种结构的项目也衡量了另一种结构。此外，在整个34个国家/地区中发现了结构和度量不变性。因此，研究人员现在可以使用ISSP数据研究这些国家中民族主义，CP和其他理论构架之间的关系。但是，该分析不支持标量不变性，因此在比较各国的民族主义和CP手段时会出现问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Political Analysis》 |2009年第1期|p.64-82|共19页
  • 作者

    Eldad Davidov;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cologne, Greinstrasse 2, 50939 Cologne, Germanye-mail: davidov{at}wiso.uni-koeln.de (corresponding author);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号