• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Postcolonial Studies >Aboriginal history, minority histories and historical wounds: the postcolonial condition, historical knowledge and the public life of history in Australia
【24h】

Aboriginal history, minority histories and historical wounds: the postcolonial condition, historical knowledge and the public life of history in Australia

机译：土著历史，少数民族历史和历史创伤：澳大利亚的后殖民状况，历史知识和历史公共生活

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article traces the different ways in which the discipline of history has been democratized in the postcolonial context of Australia, and considers the implications of this for historical knowledge and the public life of history as these have been defined by Dipesh Chakrabarty. It does this by examining three distinctive discursive formations, namely Aboriginal history, minority histories, and what Chakrabarty has called historical wounds.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2011.563454
机译：本文追溯了在澳大利亚的后殖民时代中使历史学科民主化的不同方式，并考虑了这对Dipesh Chakrabarty所定义的历史知识和历史公共生活的影响。它通过检查三种独特的话语形式来做到这一点，即土著历史，少数民族历史和查克拉巴蒂所说的历史创伤。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，service_compact： twitter，technorati，美味，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多“，发布：” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2011.563454

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号