首页> 外文期刊>Practice >Historical abuse in residential child care: An alternative view
【24h】

Historical abuse in residential child care: An alternative view

机译:寄宿家庭托儿所的历史虐待:另一种观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent decades residential child care practice across the English-speaking world has been shaped by an assumption of widespread historical abuse. The author questions this dominant account, arguing that the emotion surrounding institutional abuse can preclude appropriately critical examination. Investigations into historical abuse reflect the witch-hunt metaphor employed in relation to previous child abuse panics in family and community settings. The failure to look critically at this subject has led to the prosecution of scores of staff. There is evidence to suggest that many allegations are false, based on the possibility of financial reward, a state of affairs that also diminishes the experiences of genuine victims of abuse. At a wider level, the assumption of abuse legitimises managerial and regulatory approaches to practice which contribute to the poor condition of state care. This article gives a brief overview of abuse in residential child care settings. It challenges the premise that it was widespread and raises questions as to how such beliefs were constructed. It concludes with a discussion of the implications for staff in residential care, for genuine victims and for the governance of the sector.
机译:在最近的几十年里,整个英语地区的寄宿儿童保育实践受到了广泛的历史虐待的假设的影响。作者质疑这个占主导地位的说法,认为围绕制度滥用的情绪可以排除适当的批判性检查。对历史虐待的调查反映了与家庭和社区中先前的虐待儿童恐慌有关的猎巫比喻。未能认真看待这个问题已导致起诉数十名工作人员。有证据表明,基于经济奖励的可能性,许多指控是错误的,这种状况也减少了真正的虐待受害者的经历。在更广泛的层面上,滥用的假定使管理和监管实践的方法合法化,这加剧了国家护理的不良状况。本文简要概述了寄宿家庭托儿所中的虐待行为。它挑战了它广泛传播的前提,并提出了关于如何建立这种信念的问题。最后,讨论了对护理人员,真正受害者和该部门治理的影响。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号