• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Municipal Engineer >Discussion: Shared space—safe space?
【24h】

Discussion: Shared space—safe space?

机译：讨论：共享空间-安全空间？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Guide Dogs for the Blind Association ('Guide Dogs') has raised safety concerns about the trend among local authorities to move away from the traditional street and pavement format in town and city centres. The resulting 'shared surfaces'-with road and pavement at the same level-relies on negotiating priority and movement between vehicles and pedestrians through 'eye contact'. This puts blind and partially sighted people at an immediate disadvantage. Research has established that shared surfaces affect the safety, confidence and independence of blind and partially sighted people. Guide Dogs believes that 'shared surfaces', without clearly identified pedestrian footways and controlled crossings, pose a threat to all vulnerable road users, including those with physical, sensory or cognitive impairments.
机译：盲人协会的导盲犬（“导盲犬”）引起了人们对地方当局在城镇和市中心摆脱传统街道和人行道形式趋势的担忧。最终的“共享表面”（与道路和人行道处于同一水平）依赖于通过“目光接触”协商优先级和车辆与行人之间的移动。这使盲人和弱视人立即处于不利地位。研究已经确定，共享的表面会影响盲人和部分失明人士的安全，信心和独立性。导盲犬认为，“共享地面”没有明确的人行道和受控的人行横道，会对所有弱势道路使用者（包括身体，感觉或认知障碍者）构成威胁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号