...
首页> 外文期刊>Process Heating >Win-Win...And Win...And Win...
【24h】

Win-Win...And Win...And Win...

机译:双赢...赢...赢...

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I've been beating this drum for years, but a lot of people haven't heard the music, so here we go again. Choosing to give your heat processing equipment regular maintenance and tune-ups is not a win-lose decision. Many managers seem to think maintenance avoided equals labor cost avoided, which equals more profitability. It's the same old equa- low that other tasks with a higher benefit-to-cost ratio took priority. So, people made what seemed to be the responsible decision and put off maintenance. Today, the situation is different. Energy costs have jumped in the last few years, and the left side of the equation is getting fatter day by day. Just the same, this is a very limited view of the real situation. To really What's the cost of that lost production time? What really stings is, that in the end, you haven't avoided the cost of maintenance. In fact, emergency maintenance costs much more than routine work, even when you have the tools and parts on hand to do the job. And if you don't, you're facing added lost time and costs as you chase around for the stuff you need.
机译:我多年来一直在敲鼓,但是很多人都没有听过音乐,所以我们再次开始。选择给您的热处理设备进行定期维护和调整并非双赢的决定。许多管理者似乎认为避免维护等于避免了人工成本,这意味着更高的盈利能力。与以前的情况相同,其他优先考虑的是具有较高成本效益比的其他任务。因此,人们做出了负责任的决定并推迟了维护。今天,情况有所不同。过去几年中,能源成本猛增,方程式的左侧日益肥胖。同样,这是对实际情况的非常有限的看法。真的,浪费生产时间的代价是什么?真正令人讨厌的是,最后,您还没有避免维护成本。实际上,即使您手头有工具和零件来进行工作,紧急维护的成本也要比常规工作高得多。如果您不这样做,则在寻找所需的东西时,您将面临更多的时间和成本损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号