• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Promet-traffic & transportation >COMPARISON BETWEEN REACTIVE AND PROACTIVE PROTOCOLS OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS: RAILWAY APPLICATION
【24h】

COMPARISON BETWEEN REACTIVE AND PROACTIVE PROTOCOLS OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS: RAILWAY APPLICATION

机译：无线传感器网络的反应性和反应性协议的比较：铁路应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Railway is a critical application; hence, all systems that compose the railway infrastructure must meet two conditions: availability and safety. The availability ensures continuous operation of the system; on the other hand, safety is achieved when the device works properly regardless of the environmental or operating conditions. In addition, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) are used to perform tasks previously performed manually. However, it is necessary to analyse what protocol is appropriate for the railway industry, since availability and safety are the required attributes. In this work, a recently proposed routing protocol, the Multi-Parent Hierarchical (MPH), has been compared with a well-known protocol, the Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), in order to find the most suitable one for the railway applications. For this purpose, a simulator has been developed, which faithfully reifies the workings of a given protocol, considering a fixed, reconfigurable ad-hoc network given by the number and location of participants, and general network conditions.
机译：铁路是至关重要的应用。因此，构成铁路基础设施的所有系统都必须满足两个条件：可用性和安全性。可用性确保系统连续运行；另一方面，无论环境或工作条件如何，只要设备正常工作，都可以实现安全性。此外，无线传感器网络（WSN）用于执行以前手动执行的任务。但是，有必要分析哪种协议适合铁路行业，因为可用性和安全性是必需的属性。在这项工作中，为了找到最合适的路由协议，将最近提出的路由协议多父级分层协议（MPH）与著名的协议即席按需距离矢量（AODV）进行了比较。用于铁路。为此目的，已经开发了一种模拟器，该模拟器在考虑参与者数量和位置以及一般网络条件的情况下，忠实地验证了给定协议的工作原理，考虑了一个固定的，可重新配置的自组织网络。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号