...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >Reply to Commentaries
【24h】

Reply to Commentaries

机译：回复评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In their rich discussions, Jonathan Slavin and Steven Stern have raised several issues that I take up in this reply. I agree with Slavin's point about agency, and also respond to his perspective on the “real mind of the analyst.” In response to Stern, I reassert the utility of multiple self-state theory and discuss further the experiences of enactment with my patient. I expand on ideas about shared consciousness and its role in opening up closed internal object worlds. Stern's questions about how what was unconscious became conscious for me are explored. Finally, I comment on interpenetrability between analyst and patient and the issue of the analyst's vulnerability.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2012.735597
机译：乔纳森·斯拉文（Jonathan Slavin）和史蒂文·斯特恩（Steven Stern）在激烈的讨论中提出了我在本答复中涉及的几个问题。我同意斯拉文关于代理的观点，也回应了他对“分析师的真实思想”的看法。在回应斯特恩时，我重申了多重自我状态理论的效用，并进一步讨论了立法的经验。和我的病人。我扩展了关于共享意识及其在打开封闭的内部对象世界中的作用的观念。探究了斯特恩关于无意识的东西对我来说是有意识的问题。最后，我评论了分析人员与患者之间的互穿性以及分析人员的漏洞问题。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“ Taylor＆Francis Online”，services_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin ，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2012.735597

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号