...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >Reply to Commentaries
【24h】

Reply to Commentaries

机译：回复评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this brief reply I describe an implicit clinical focus within my paper that both reviews have helped me to perceive. This focus is upon schizoid functioning—more specifically upon the search for nontraumatic, yet resonant, experiences of two-person intimacy within the insulated bubble of a schizoid transference. I integrate this implicit focus with the rich commentary provided by both reviewers— first with Dr. Carnochan's assertion that my work is part of a trend toward the cross-fertilization of Kleinian and relational approaches; then with Dr. Lovett's creative deconstruction of my terminology (i.e., the “physical” and “visual” automatic link between introjection and internalization). I return for a third time to the concept of schizoid transference in engaging with Dr. Lovett's uncertainty as to the need for new terminology to describe processes of introjection—specifically the terms penetratingonpenetrating. This was extremely helpful, as it triggered my awareness that, for me, the most valuable aspect of the term “penetrating” here is its evocative quality (i.e., penetration can potentially imply “intrusion” or even “violation”). Thinking in these terms increased my sensitivity to the sufferings and fears of the two patients presented here. In this sense perhaps penetratingonpenetrating identification does not need to be seen as a singular phenomenon, but rather as a new and helpful lens through which the vicissitudes of projective identification can be viewed—a lens that emphasizes the backdrop of perpetually feared violation which characterizes the schizoid patient's world and transference.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2011.611720
机译：在这篇简短的回复中，我描述了论文中隐含的临床重点，两项评论均帮助我理解了这一点。这个重点是在类iz骨的功能上，更具体地说是在类骨转移的绝缘气泡内寻找非创伤性但又共振的两人亲密经历。我将这种隐含的焦点与两位审稿人提供的丰富评论相结合，首先是Carnochan博士的断言，即我的工作是克莱因主义和关系方法交叉应用趋势的一部分。随后，洛维特博士创造性地解构了我的术语（即内插与内化之间的“物理”和“视觉”自动链接）。我第三次回到类裂移移的概念上，与洛夫特博士的不确定性有关，即需要新的术语来描述注入的过程，特别是穿透/不渗透的术语。这非常有帮助，因为它激发了我的意识，对我而言，“穿透”一词最有价值的方面是它令人回味的品质（即渗透可能意味着“侵入”或什至是“侵入”）。 “违反”）。用这些术语思考增加了我对这里介绍的两名患者的痛苦和恐惧的敏感性。从这个意义上说，也许穿透性/非穿透性识别不需要被看作是一种奇异的现象，而可以看作是一种新的有用的视角，通过它可以看到投射性识别的沧桑-这是一种强调永久恐惧的背景的镜头。表征精神分裂症患者的世界和移情。查看全文下载全文相关变量add add_id “，pubid：” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2011.611720

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号