...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >“T” in Interpellation Stands for Terror: Commentary on Paper by Orna Guralnik and Daphne Simeon
【24h】

“T” in Interpellation Stands for Terror: Commentary on Paper by Orna Guralnik and Daphne Simeon

机译：插词代表恐怖中的“ T”：Orna Guralnik和Daphne Simeon在纸上的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Closing the gap between recognition and interpellation is an important perspective to add to our armamentarium in considering depersonalization and its relief. The perspective of interpellation can help us understand how society contributes to devastating emotional experience that likely evokes dissociative process to become persistently overactive. I suspect that societal interpellation maintains depersonalization more than it causes it, that family dynamics are hidden in societal discourse, and that a clinician who draws out this perspective, as appropriate, gains credibility and provides relief in the provision of safety essential for the dissociative mind to change its modus operandi and be less isolated from self and other.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2010.502503
机译：缩小识别与干扰之间的差距是在考虑取消人格化及其救济时增加我们军备库的重要视角。交互作用的观点可以帮助我们理解社会如何促成毁灭性的情感体验，这种情感体验可能引起解离过程变得持续过度活跃。我怀疑社会困扰对人格解体作用的维持程度超出其原因，家庭动态隐藏在社会话语中，并且得出适当观点的临床医生会获得信誉，并在为解离思想提供必要的安全性方面有所缓解更改其操作方式并减少与自身和其他人的隔离。 ，digg，google，more“，发布号：” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2010.502503

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号