...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >Psychoanalysis and Nature: Commentary on Papers by Bodnar and Santostefano
【24h】

Psychoanalysis and Nature: Commentary on Papers by Bodnar and Santostefano

机译:心理分析与自然:对博德纳尔和圣托斯特凡诺的论文的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This is a response to papers by Sebastiano Santostefano and Susan Bodnar. The response argues that the psychoanalytic view of constitutive conflict makes any assimilation of analysis and ecology very problematic. Patients may benefit from being in pleasant surroundings outside urban areas, but this is not psychoanalytic work. Psychoanalysis would entail them coming to understand why they are fueled by desires they do not recognize as their own. It would entail them working through how these desires have come to belong to them. Calling these desires natural or unnatural is not helpful, and it may be pernicious.
机译:这是对塞巴斯蒂亚诺·桑托斯特凡诺(Sebastiano Santostefano)和苏珊·博德纳(Susan Bodnar)的论文的回应。回应认为,本构性冲突的心理分析观点使分析和生态学的任何同化都成问题。患者可能会受益于在市区以外的宜人环境中,但这不是精神分析工作。心理分析将使他们开始理解为什么他们因自己不认识自己的欲望而感到生气。这将需要他们努力解决这些愿望如何成为他们的归属。将这些欲望称为自然或不自然无助,这可能是有害的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号