首页> 外文期刊>Psychological Bulletin >On broadening the cognitive, motivational, and sociostructural scope of theorizing about gender development and functioning: Comment on Martin, Ruble, and Szkrvbalo (2002)
【24h】

On broadening the cognitive, motivational, and sociostructural scope of theorizing about gender development and functioning: Comment on Martin, Ruble, and Szkrvbalo (2002)

机译:关于拓宽性别发展和功能理论的认知,动机和社会结构范围:Martin,Ruble和Szkrvbalo(2002)的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In their article on gender development, C. L. Martin, D. N. Ruble, and J. Szkrybalo (2002) contrasted their conception of gender development with that of social cognitive theory. The authors of this commentary correct misrepresentations of social cognitive theory and analyze the conceptual and empirical status of Martin et al.'s (2002) theory that gender stereotype matching is the main motivating force of gender development. Martin et al. (2002) based their claim for the causal primacy of gender self-categorization on construal of gender discrimination as rudimentary self-identity, equivocal empirical evidence, and dismissal of discordant evidence because of methodological deficiencies. The repeated finding that gendered preferences and behavior precede emergence of a sense of self is discordant with their theory. Different lines of evidence confirm that gender development and functioning are socially situated, richly contextualized, and conditionally manifested rather than governed mainly by an intrinsic drive to match stereotypic gender self-conception.
机译:C. L. Martin,D。N. Ruble和J. Szkrybalo(2002)在其关于性别发展的文章中将他们的性别发展概念与社会认知理论进行了对比。该评论的作者纠正了社会认知理论的错误陈述,并分析了马丁等人(2002年)认为性别刻板印象匹配是性别发展的主要动力的理论和经验地位。马丁等。 (2002年)基于性别歧视的基本观点,模棱两可的经验证据以及由于方法论上的缺陷而驳回不一致的证据,将性别自我归类的因果关系放在第一位。反复发现性别偏好和行为先于自我意识的发现与他们的理论不一致。不同的证据表明,性别发展和功能是社会定位,丰富的语境和有条件地表现出来的,而不是主要由匹配刻板印象的性别自我观念的内在动力支配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号