• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychology, Crime & Law >The effects of different paraphrasing styles on the quality of reports from young child witnesses
【24h】

The effects of different paraphrasing styles on the quality of reports from young child witnesses

机译：不同措辞样式对幼儿证人报告质量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Young children's descriptions of sexual abuse are often sparse thus creating the need for techniques that elicit lengthier accounts. 'Paraphrasing', or repeating information children have just disclosed, is a technique sometimes used by forensic interviewers to clarify or elicit information (e.g. if a child stated 'He touched me', an interviewer could respond 'He touched you?'). However, the effects of paraphrasing have yet to be scientifically assessed. The impact of different paraphrasing styles on young children's reports was investigated. Overall, paraphrasing per se did not improve the length, richness, or accuracy of reports when compared to open-ended prompts such as 'tell me more', but some styles of paraphrasing were more beneficial than others. The results provide clear recommendations for investigative interviewers about how to use paraphrasing appropriately, and which practices can compromise the quality of children's reports.
机译：幼儿对性虐待的描述通常很少，因此需要采用引人注目的方法。法医访问者有时会使用“改写”或重复儿童刚刚披露的信息的方法来澄清或引出信息（例如，如果孩子说“他触摸了我”，访问者可以回答“他触摸了你？”）。但是，释义的效果尚待科学评估。调查了不同的释义样式对幼儿报告的影响。总体而言，与开放式提示（例如“告诉我更多”）相比，释义本身并不能提高报告的长度，丰富度或准确性，但是某些释义样式比其他形式更具优势。结果为调查员提供了明确的建议，说明如何适当地使用释义，以及哪些做法会损害儿童报告的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号