...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public Administration and Development >The Limits of Institutional Reform in Development: Changing Rules for Realistic Solutions
【24h】

The Limits of Institutional Reform in Development: Changing Rules for Realistic Solutions

机译：发展中的机构改革的局限：改变现实解决方案的规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This book is notable for the boundaries it crosses, the questions it raises, the answers it suggests, and the new avenues it invites us to explore. Matt Andrews crosses boundaries separating scholars and doers. He asks why so many externally financed efforts at institutional reform in the public sector fall short of expectations. His answers focus on process. Too often, reforms are driven by foreign aid, guided by best practice from other countries, and characterized on both sides by overly optimistic promises of better performance (measured by formal changes, rather than by slow-to-emerge development outcomes). But there is hope. Reform processes that are "instigated" by foreigners can succeed through "accumulated, endogenous responses to multiple problems over long periods" (p. 130). How?
机译：本书以其跨越的边界，提出的问题，给出的答案以及邀请我们探索的新途径而著称。马特·安德鲁斯（Matt Andrews）跨越了学者和行动者之间的界限。他问为什么在公共部门进行机构改革的如此多的外部筹资努力达不到预期。他的答案集中在过程上。改革常常是由外国援助驱动的，并以其他国家的最佳做法为指导，双方的特征都是过分乐观地希望取得更好的绩效（以正式变化衡量，而不是以缓慢出现的发展成果衡量）。但是有希望。外国人“煽动”的改革过程可以通过“长期积累，对多种问题的内生性应对”而成功（第130页）。怎么样？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号