...
首页> 外文期刊>Public choice >Politics and the implementation of public policy:The case of the US military housing allowance program
【24h】

Politics and the implementation of public policy:The case of the US military housing allowance program

机译:政治与公共政策的实施:以美国军事住房补贴计划为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Are bureaucracies in fact controlled by the president, Congress, or legislation? We analyze a 1998 policy change in the Department of Defense's (DoD) $6.5 billion annual military housing allowance program. Results show that both the president and Congress were able to influence the bureaucracy, even in the presence of an exceedingly specific law that outlined the manner in which the DoD was to allocate the funds. After policy implementation, allowances were disproportionately higher in locations that (a) supported the president in the 1996 election and (b) were represented by members of the House or Senate Armed Services Committees.
机译:官僚机构实际上是由总统,国会或法律控制的吗?我们分析了1998年美国国防部(DoD)每年65亿美元的军事住房津贴计划的政策变化。结果表明,即使存在一部非常具体的法律,概述了国防部分配资金的方式,总统和国会都能够影响官僚机构。政策实施后,在(a)支持1996年总统大选和(b)由众议院或参议院武装委员会成员代表的地区,津贴高得多。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Public choice》 |2009年第4期|367-386|共20页
  • 作者

    S.E. Carrell; J.A. Hauge;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics, University of California, Davis and National Bureau of Economic Research, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA;

    Department of Economics, University of North Texas, 1417 West Hickory Street, Denton, TX 76203, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    politics; bureaucracy; military compensation;

    机译:政治;官僚;军事赔偿;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号