...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public performance & management review >An Elaboration Likelihood Approach to Competition Authorities in Japan and the United States
【24h】

An Elaboration Likelihood Approach to Competition Authorities in Japan and the United States

机译：日本和美国竞争当局的拟定可能性方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article examines the factors that affect the administrative performance of competition authorities, using a legitimacy framework as well as the authority's resources or political effects. It applies persuasion theory to analyze the legitimacy framework and ranks each element of concern based on the elaboration likelihood approach. Taking the enforcement of the Antimonopoly Act by the Japan Fair Trade Commission as an example for specific analysis, a regression analysis is conducted on some of the elements that influence enforcement. The results show that resources and reflection have a significant influence on the number of legal actions and that one factor of legitimacy-results-influences them, while other factors of legitimacy, such as recognition and professionalism, have weaker but acceptable relevance. This approach is extended to the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.
机译：本文使用合法性框架以及竞争管理机构的资源或政治影响来研究影响竞争管理机构行政绩效的因素。它运用说服理论来分析合法性框架，并根据拟定可能性方法对关注的每个要素进行排序。以日本公平贸易委员会执行《反垄断法》为例进行具体分析，对影响执法的某些因素进行了回归分析。结果表明，资源和反思对法律诉讼的数量有重大影响，合法性结果的一个因素影响法律行动，而合法性的其他因素（如认可度和专业性）则具有较弱但可以接受的相关性。这种方法扩展到了美国司法部的反托拉斯司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号