• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >The meat of the matter: grasping and judging xenotransplantation
【24h】

The meat of the matter: grasping and judging xenotransplantation

机译：问题的实质：掌握和判断异种移植

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper is concerned with the ways in which lay people come to understand and assess xenotransplantation. Drawing on focus group data, we explore how people can both demonstrate a collective process of cost-benefit thinking and tacitly problematize this by deploying three meta-arguments that we call "trust," "telos," and "trump." Respectively, these meta-arguments emphasize: unexamined relations of trust; irrelevance because innovations such as xenotransplantation are inevitable; and redundancy in the face of desperation. We then consider how lay people draw upon certain analogies associated with meat in order to grasp the meaning of xenotransplantation. The data show how "meat" itself displays disparate and contested meanings. Depending on what aspects of meat are emphasized, xenotransplantation is represented in either a negative or a positive light. Some of the implications of the fluidity of the meaning of both meat and xenotransplantation for cost-benefit thinking in lay and expert discourse are discussed.
机译：本文关注的是外行人了解和评估异种移植的方式。利用焦点小组的数据，我们探索人们如何既可以展示成本效益思考的集体过程，又可以通过部署三个我们称为“信任”，“目标”和“王牌”的元参数来默示地解决这一问题。这些元论据分别强调：未经审查的信任关系；无关紧要，因为异种移植等创新是不可避免的；和面对绝望的冗余。然后，我们考虑外行人如何利用与肉类相关的某些类比来掌握异种移植的含义。数据表明“肉”本身如何显示完全不同的含义。根据所强调的肉类的不同，异种移植会以负面或正面的形式出现。讨论了肉类和异种移植的含义的流动性对外行和专家话语中的成本－收益思想的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号