首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Risk and the environment reporters: a four-region analysis
【24h】

Risk and the environment reporters: a four-region analysis

机译:风险与环境记者:四区域分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Who are the environment reporters who explain the science of the environment to the general public? Do they consider risk when writing environmental stories'? How often do they say they use a risk assessment angle compared to other issues? Are they concerned that they may be exaggerating environmental risks, excessively frightening their readers and viewers?This study used a census approach to interview 354 environment reporters in four regions of the United States. The majority of environment reporters in all four regions said they used risk angles at least sometimes, many more than might have been true in the past. However, the journalists said they more frequently framed their stories using government, human-interest, business, nature, pollution, politics, science, and health angles, and some reporters, ranging from 28.3 percent in New England to 41.8 percent in the Pacific Northwest, said they rarely or never included risk assessment in their environmental stories. Although most journalists in the four regions did not believe that news reports generally sensationalized environmental risks, some reporters (16.9-25.0 percent) said that environmental journalists generally have overblown environmental risks, unduly alarming the public.
机译:谁是向普通大众讲解环境科学的环境记者?他们在撰写环境故事时会考虑风险吗?与其他问题相比,他们多久说一次使用风险评估角度?他们是否担心自己可能会夸大环境风险,过度吓right读者和观看者?这项研究采用人口普查方法采访了美国四个地区的354位环境记者。所有四个地区的大多数环境记者都表示,他们至少有时使用风险角度,这比过去的真实情况要多得多。但是,记者表示,他们更经常使用政府,人的利益,商业,自然,污染,政治,科学和健康的角度来撰写故事,一些记者的报道范围从新英格兰的28.3%到西北太平洋的41.8%。表示,他们很少或从未在他们的环境故事中包括风险评估。尽管四个地区的大多数记者不相信新闻报道会普遍引起环境风险,但一些记者(16.9-25.0%)表示,环境记者普遍具有过大的环境风险,过分地警告了公众。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号