• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities
【24h】

A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities

机译：科学家与传播学者对科学家的公众参与活动的看法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study investigated how communication scholars view scientists' public engagement as well as differences between how these scholars and natural and physical scientists think about the topic. The study used surveys of authors who recently published in five journals related to science communication alongside surveys of scientists from three prominent professional science societies. The results suggest that communication scholars (N = 362) shared some views with the scientists (N = 307, 373, 372) regarding scientists' performance, factors that influence engagement activities, and communication objectives, but potentially important differences were observed as well. Scientists have more positive beliefs about engagement norms and also rate their engagement efficacy relatively high. But communication scholars have higher expectations for online engagement amount. The findings address gaps in perceptions and performances from these two communities and suggest areas of potential emphasis for science communication training.
机译：这项研究调查了交流学者如何看待科学家的公众参与，以及这些学者与自然和自然科学家对这个话题的看法之间的差异。该研究使用了对最近在五种与科学传播有关的期刊上发表的作者的调查以及对来自三个著名专业科学学会的科学家的调查。结果表明，交流学者（N = 362）与科学家（N = 307、373、372）就科学家的绩效，影响参与活动的因素和交流目标达成了共识，但也观察到了潜在的重要差异。科学家对参与规范抱有更积极的信念，并对其参与效能进行了较高评价。但是，传播学者对在线参与量有更高的期望。研究结果解决了这两个社区在观念和表现方面的差距，并提出了可能需要重点关注科学传播训练的领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号