• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Can media monitoring be a proxy for public opinion about technoscientific controversies? The case of the Italian public debate on nuclear power
【24h】

Can media monitoring be a proxy for public opinion about technoscientific controversies? The case of the Italian public debate on nuclear power

机译：媒体监控能否代替有关技术科学争议的舆论？意大利关于核电的公开辩论案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Is it possible to infer information about public opinion by looking at how the media discuss controversial technoscientific public issues? We conduct content analysis on media coverage of nuclear power in Italy in the years 1992-2012 and compare it with longitudinal public opinion surveys. By treating a large amount of textual data and applying an innovative methodology based on indicators of the presence of'risky terms', that is, keywords referring to the issue of risk and danger, very high correlation has been found between media discourse on risk and opposition within public opinion. The analysis is conducted testing as a preliminary step Mazur's hypothesis on quantity of coverage and opposition towards controversial technoscience. Then, risk content measures are used in order to gain stronger correlations between media and public attitudes towards nuclear power.
机译：通过观察媒体如何讨论有争议的技术科学性公共问题，是否可以推断出有关公众舆论的信息？我们对1992-2012年意大利核电媒体报道进行内容分析，并将其与纵向民意调查相比较。通过处理大量文本数据并基于“风险术语”的存在指标（即，指风险和危险问题的关键词）应用创新方法，已发现媒体关于风险与风险的论述之间具有非常高的相关性。舆论反对。作为初步步骤，对Mazur的假设进行了分析，该假设涉及范围和反对有争议的技术科学的数量。然后，使用风险含量测度，以便获得媒体与公众对核电态度之间的更强关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号