• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Assessing climate change beliefs: Response effects of question wording and response alternatives
【24h】

Assessing climate change beliefs: Response effects of question wording and response alternatives

机译：评估气候变化信念：问题措辞和回应选择的回应效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To date, there is no 'gold standard' on how to best measure public climate change beliefs. We report a study (N = 897) testing four measures of climate change causation beliefs, drawn from four sources: the CSIRO, Griffith University, the Gallup poll, and the Newspoll. We found that question wording influences the outcome of beliefs reported. Questions that did not allow respondents to choose the option of believing in an equal mix of natural and anthropogenic climate change obtained different results to those that included the option. Age and belief groups were found to be important predictors of how consistent people were in reporting their beliefs. Response consistency gave some support to past findings suggesting climate change beliefs reflect something deeper in the individual belief system. Each belief question was assessed against five criterion variables commonly used in climate change literature. Implications for future studies are discussed.
机译：迄今为止，如何最好地衡量公共气候变化信念尚无“金标准”。我们报告了一项研究（N = 897），该研究从以下四个方面对气候变化因果关系信念的四种度量进行了研究：CSIRO，格里菲斯大学，盖洛普民意调查和新闻调查。我们发现问题措辞会影响所报告的信念的结果。不允许受访者选择相信自然气候变化和人为气候变化的均等选择的问题，得出的结果与选择该方法的结果不同。人们发现，年龄和信仰群体是人们报告其信仰的一致性的重要预测指标。响应的一致性为过去的发现提供了支持，表明气候变化信念反映了个体信念体系中更深层次的内容。针对每个信念问题，根据气候变化文献中常用的五个标准变量进行了评估。讨论了对未来研究的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号