• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the rhetorical construction of 'bad' scientific work
【24h】

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the rhetorical construction of 'bad' scientific work

机译：严重急性呼吸系统综合症（SARS）和“不良”科研工作的修辞结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

How are secondary accounts of "bad" scientific practice constructed? How do they engage with the primary data produced by "bad" scientists? And what happens to those primary data as generations of secondary accounts purporting to describe them accumulate? This paper addresses such questions via a case study of Dr. Hong, a microbiologist accused of "bad" scientific practice by numerous secondary accounts of the 2003 SARS outbreak. Bringing Hong's own account of his own actions into dialogue with one of the most influential secondary accounts of his actions, the paper highlights the gross disparity between the two. Having argued that the rhetorical structuring of the secondary account is, ultimately, responsible for Hong's characterisation as a "bad" scientist, it then moves to explore how subsequent accounts developed their own characterisations. What becomes clear is that as secondary accounts began feeding off one another, references to Hong's account disappeared. Aided by the concepts of the "vanishing" and the "phantasm," the paper concludes with a consideration of how this process left Hong's work with a very peculiar form of existence.
机译：如何构造“不良”科学实践的辅助描述？他们如何处理“坏”科学家产生的原始数据？当几代次要帐户描述原始数据时，这些主要数据又发生了什么呢？本文通过对Hong博士的案例研究解决了这些问题，Hong博士被2003年SARS爆发的许多次要研究指控为“不良”科学实践。这篇论文将洪自己对自己行为的描述与最有影响力的次要行为之一进行了对话，强调了两者之间的巨大差距。在论证了次级账户的修辞结构最终归因于Hong的“坏”科学家特征之后，它接着探讨了随后的账户如何发展自己的特征。显而易见的是，随着辅助账户开始相互补充，对Hong账户的引用也消失了。在“消失”和“幻象”概念的辅助下，本文最后考虑了这一过程如何使洪的作品具有非常特殊的存在形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号