首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Public assessment of new surveillance-oriented security technologies: Beyond the trade-off between privacy and security
【24h】

Public assessment of new surveillance-oriented security technologies: Beyond the trade-off between privacy and security

机译:对新的面向监视的安全技术的公共评估:超越隐私和安全之间的权衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As surveillance-oriented security technologies (SOSTs) are considered security enhancing but also privacy infringing, citizens are expected to trade part of their privacy for higher security. Drawing from the PRISE project, this study casts some light on how citizens actually assess SOSTs through a combined analysis of focus groups and survey data. First, the outcomes suggest that people did not assess SOSTs in abstract terms but in relation to the specific institutional and social context of implementation. Second, from this embedded viewpoint, citizens either expressed concern about government's surveillance intentions and considered SOSTs mainly as privacy infringing, or trusted political institutions and believed that SOSTs effectively enhanced their security. None of them, however, seemed to trade privacy for security because concerned citizens saw their privacy being infringed without having their security enhanced, whilst trusting citizens saw their security being increased without their privacy being affected.
机译:由于面向监视的安全技术(SOST)被认为增强了安全性,但同时也侵犯了隐私权,因此,人们希望将其部分隐私权交易以获得更高的安全性。这项研究是从PRIZE项目获得的,它通过对焦点小组和调查数据的综合分析,揭示了公民如何实际评估SOST。首先,结果表明,人们不是以抽象的方式评估SOST,而是根据实施的具体制度和社会背景进行评估。其次,从这种内在的观点来看,公民要么对政府的监视意图表示担忧,要么主要将SOST视为侵犯隐私权,要么将其视为值得信赖的政治机构,并认为SOST可以有效地增强其安全性。但是,他们似乎都没有用隐私权来换取安全性,因为有关的公民看到其隐私权遭到了侵犯而没有增强其安全性,而信任公民看到了他们的安全性得到了提高而其隐私权没有受到影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号