...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public works management & policy >Leadership and Strategy: A Comparison of the Outcomes and Institutional Designs of the Alameda Corridor and Alameda Corridor East Projects
【24h】

Leadership and Strategy: A Comparison of the Outcomes and Institutional Designs of the Alameda Corridor and Alameda Corridor East Projects

机译：领导力与策略：阿拉米达走廊和阿拉米达走廊东部项目的成果和制度设计比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research examines and compares the development of two large-scale projects in Southern California, the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (ACTA) and the Alameda Corridor East (ACE), sharing a number of features for useful paired comparison. Both have similar political institutions at the regional and local levels, serve the same ports and the same private sector railroad parties, and have a similar regional purpose. This paper uses a specific model of strategy to consider a set of outcomes designated by the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) as a framework that can be applied across different projects and regions.The TBL framework tests the strategy model for explanatory power, for the criteria needed for large scale projects to move forward. This model makes explicit the strategic components of each project that advance a triple bottom line as three distinct outcomes: Increased freight velocity (efficiency), improved air quality and reduced traffic congestion (environment), community protection and safety (equity).
机译：这项研究检查并比较了南加州两个大型项目的发展情况，即阿拉米达走廊运输管理局（ACTA）和阿拉米达走廊东部（ACE），它们具有许多有用的成对比较特征。两者在区域和地方一级都有类似的政治机构，为相同的港口和私营部门的铁路党服务，并具有相似的区域目的。本文使用一种特定的策略模型来考虑一组由三重底线（TBL）指定的结果，该框架可以应用于不同的项目和地区.TBL框架针对该标准测试了策略模型的解释力大型项目向前发展所需要的。该模型明确提出了每个项目的战略组成部分，这些战略组成部分以三项不同的成果推动了三重底线：提高货运速度（效率），改善空气质量并减少交通拥堵（环境），社区保护和安全（公平）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号