...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative research journal >Dichotomies of method and practice: a review of literature on transcription
【24h】

Dichotomies of method and practice: a review of literature on transcription

机译：方法与实践二分法：转录文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - Transcription is an integral component to qualitative research, and as such, the ways that researchers discuss transcription in the literature matter. Scholarly discussions on the "how" and "why" of transcription not only shape discourse within interview data-based fields; they inform the ways that researchers understand the roles and ramifications of transcribing. This study aims to provide a comprehensive literature review of articles on transcription published in qualitative methods journals over the past 25 years, offering implications for research practice and pedagogy. Design/methodology/approach - The literature review asked How do qualitative researchers discuss transcription/transcribing? The authors first reviewed how transcription was discussed in the literature in qualitative studies in the social sciences broadly. Based on the findings, the authors then conducted a comprehensive literature review in 14 qualitative methods journals. Findings - The authors found that overall, authors discussed transcription either as a technical tool or as a complex, researcher-constructed process. Specifically, utilitarian discussions of transcription emphasized transcription accuracy and efficiency, while theoretical discussions of transcription emphasized a continuously analytic and researcher-constructed process. Originality/value - This study offers a comprehensive overview of the past 25 years of articles published on transcription. The authors conclude with a discussion of articles that bridge the theoretical and utilitarian discussions, as well as considerations for using transcription as a pedagogical tool for teaching qualitative research methods.
机译：目的 - 转录是定性研究的一个组成部分，因此，研究人员讨论文学问题的转录方式。学术讨论“如何”和“为什么”的转录不仅在面试基于数据的领域内的形状话题;他们通知研究人员了解作用和转录的后果的方式。本研究旨在为过去25年来提供关于定性方法的转录文章的全面文献综述，为研究实践和教育学提供了影响。设计/方法/方法 - 文献综述询问定性研究人员如何讨论转录/转录？作者首先审查了如何在广泛的社会科学研究中讨论转录的文献。根据调查结果，作者随后在14项定性方法中进行了全面的文献综述。调查结果 - 作者发现，总体而言，作者讨论了转录作为技术工具或作为复杂的研究人员构建的过程。具体而言，经济讨论转录强调转录准确性和效率，而转录的理论讨论强调了一种不断分析和研究人员构建的过程。原创性/价值 - 本研究提供了全面概述了过去25年的转录公布的文章。作者讨论了讨论弥合理论和功利讨论的文章，​​以及使用转录作为教学定性研究方法的教学工具的考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号