首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative research journal >Auto-, duo- and collaborative- ethnographies: 'caring' in an audit culture climate
【24h】

Auto-, duo- and collaborative- ethnographies: 'caring' in an audit culture climate

机译:自动,双人和协作人种志:在审核文化氛围中“关怀”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to make a case for the strength of qualitative work, but more specifically for various kinds of ethnographies. Design/methodology/approach - The authors argue that global neoliberal and audit culture policies have crept into academic research, tertiary education practice, and research culture. Findings - The authors then discuss major tenets of and make the case for the use of auto-, duo-, and collaborative-ethnographies as caring practices and research method(ologies) that may in fact push back against such hegemonic neoliberal practices in the academy. Finally, the authors link these caring types of ethnographies to the papers within this special issue. Originality/value - This is an original look at the concepts of auto-, duo-, and collaborative-ethnographies with relation to caring practices.
机译:目的-本文的目的是为了证明定性工作的力量,更具体地说是针对各种民族志。设计/方法论/方法-作者认为全球新自由主义和审计文化政策已渗透到学术研究,高等教育实践和研究文化中。调查结果-作者随后讨论了自动民族志,双重民族志和协作民族志作为关怀实践和研究方法(学)的主要原则,并提出了理由,这些事实实际上可能会在学院中反对这种霸权的新自由主义实践。最后,作者将这些民族志类型与本期特刊中的论文联系起来。原创性/价值-这是对人种学,自动人种学和协作人种学概念与关怀实践的初步了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号