...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: an international journal >INVITED COMMENTARY: Shadowing and Consensus Building: a golden bridge
【24h】

INVITED COMMENTARY: Shadowing and Consensus Building: a golden bridge

机译:特邀评论:影子与共识建设:一座金桥

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Much of what the author want to say in this paper had to do with "control" "exactness," "precision" and their declination in both: shadowing and Consensus Building Approach. The purpose of this paper is to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - This paper upholds two things: first, that shadowing is a field technique particularly attuned to action research as defined by Chris Argyris: "I would summarize [action-research and action-science] by saying that Kurt Lewin did three things: he was committed to understanding reality as the participants understood it, he used a combination of so-called 'normal' science with a narrative-integrative approach, and he tested his ideas by trying to change the things that he was studying." Findings - Second, that the results of such a research are best understood by the organization's management when the interpretation and decision process follow an approach based on active listening and an inclusive participatory methodology such as Consensus Building. Originality/value - When this does not happen, the shadowing methodology allows a very rich research experience with no real impact on the organization's life.
机译:目的-作者在本文中要说的大部分内容与“控制”,“精确性”,“精确度”及其偏差有关:遮蔽和共识构建方法。本文的目的是讨论这些问题。设计/方法论/方法-本文坚持两件事:首先,阴影是一种特别适合Chris Argyris定义的行动研究的现场技术:“我会通过说Kurt Lewin做了总结[行动研究和行动科学]三件事:他致力于按照参与者对现实的理解来理解现实,他将所谓的“正常”科学与叙事整合方法相结合,并通过尝试改变他所研究的事物来检验自己的想法。 ”发现-其次,当解释和决策过程遵循基于积极倾听和包容性参与式方法(例如共识大厦)的方法时,组织的管理层可以最好地理解此类研究的结果。独创性/价值-当这种情况不发生时,影子方法可以提供非常丰富的研究经验,而对组织的生活没有真正的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号