• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Quality Assurance in Education >Approaches to the validation of quality frameworks for e-learning
【24h】

Approaches to the validation of quality frameworks for e-learning

机译：验证电子学习质量框架的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose – This paper aims to compare the ways in which a range of quality frameworks have been validated and to identify a number of factors that have an impact on validation processes. Design/methodology/approach – Seven examples of published quality frameworks applicable to the field of e-learning are described and the methods used to validate each of the frameworks are identified and compared. The article concludes by considering a range of factors that have the potential to have an impact on such validation processes. Findings – Six methods of validation were found to have been used in relation to development of the seven frameworks that were examined: reviewing the research literature related to effectiveness in online learning; seeking input from an expert panel; undertaking empirical research; undertaking survey research; conducting pilot projects; and drawing on case studies. From the variety of approaches used and the ways in which they were used it was concluded that a recognised set of procedures for validation of quality frameworks has not yet emerged. Research limitations/implications – The most important limitation of this study is that its findings are dependent on the particular quality frameworks selected for inclusion. Practical implications – The paper draws attention to the need for more attention to be paid to the development of methods of validation that are both objective and robust. Originality/value – No previous studies were located that have looked specifically at the processes used to validate quality frameworks. This paper therefore provides some initial baseline data upon which to base future work.
机译：目的–本文旨在比较已验证一系列质量框架的方式，并确定许多对验证过程有影响的因素。设计/方法/方法–描述了适用于电子学习领域的七个已发布质量框架的示例，并标识和比较了用于验证每个框架的方法。本文的结论是考虑了可能对此类验证过程产生影响的一系列因素。研究结果–发现与六种框架的开发有关的验证方法有六种：审查与在线学习有效性有关的研究文献；寻求专家小组的意见；进行实证研究；进行调查研究；进行试验项目；并借鉴案例研究。从所使用的各种方法及其使用方法得出的结论是，尚未出现一套公认的质量框架验证程序。研究的局限性/意义–这项研究最重要的局限性在于它的发现取决于选择纳入的特定质量框架。实际意义–本文提请注意有必要更加重视开发既客观又可靠的验证方法。原创性/价值–之前没有找到专门研究用于验证质量框架的过程的研究。因此，本文提供了一些初始基准数据，这些数据可作为未来工作的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号